Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
MariaDB Server is an open-source project developed by MariaDB plc and stewarded by MariaDB Foundation. Anyone can participate in the development.
This section provides information to help you participate in making MariaDB Server and other MariaDB products a success.
If you're interested in contributing to the documentation, see this page.
Bug TrackingHow and where the community can report bugs and file feature requests, and how bug reports are processed for community users. MariaDB plc provides SLA for customer issues (see ).
To report documentation issues, please review .
There are many questions that are frequently asked about MariaDB, the organizations and the software. They have been grouped based on common topics. Click on a topic to find the question you may have. If you don't see it, please click on the button in the left margin labeled, "Ask a Question Here". We'll try to answer you question, quickly.
There are several legal aspects related to MariaDB related to licensing and contributing code
The 'MySQL' name is trademarked by Oracle, and they have chosen to keep that trademark to themselves. The name MySQL (just like the MyISAM storage engine) comes from Monty's first daughter My. The first part of 'MySQL' is pronounced like the English adjective, even if this doesn't match the correct pronunciation of the Finnish name.
MariaDB continues this tradition by being named after his younger daughter, Maria.
The name Maria was initially given to a storage engine. After MariaDB was started, to avoid confusion, it was renamed to Aria. The new name was decided as a result of a contest.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
Hi all,
I have create a remote connection between two linux server running mariadb. One run centos stream 9 with 10.5.16-MariaDB and the second run centos 7 with 5.5.68-MariaDB. Through php script automated with cron I run queries and it work.
The problem is that often i get the error HY000/2002 connection timed out. The error occurs at random times either using cron or launching it manually. For example, the script work for 10 times and on the 11th time I receive the error (HY000/2002 connection timed out) which can occur one or more times consecutively and then return to work on the umpteenth execution. The number of times the script works or not is always different.
I can't find the cause of the error. Any suggestions?
Thanks
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
You can read about the features and improvements included in the current stable release of MariaDB on the MariaDB versus MySQL page.
The MariaDB Development Plans page links to our plans for future versions of MariaDB.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
The MariaDB Development Plans page links to plans for future versions of MariaDB.
The release schedule for upcoming MariaDB releases can be found on the MariaDB Jira release page.
See also the page.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
See MariaDB Development for this.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
All versions of MariaDB are based on MySQL 5.1 and greater, thus the table_cache option is deprecated in favor of table_open_cache. This is also documented at: .
For further reading, please refer to the MySQL manual: How MySQL Opens and Closes Tables.
Examples of use cases:
MariaDB [(none)]> SHOW GLOBAL STATUS LIKE 'opened_tables';
+---------------+--------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+---------------+--------+
| Opened_tables | 354858 |
+---------------+--------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
MariaDB [(none)]> SELECT @@table_open_cache;
+--------------------+
| @@table_open_cache |
+--------------------+
| 400 |
+--------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
There are many ways to contribute to MariaDB. If you want to contribute to, or participate in the development of MariaDB, there are many ways to do so. You don't have to be a developer (but we always welcome more of those), you just have to have the willingness to help make MariaDB better. For example, we are looking for writers or translators of KB articles and people helping setting up MariaDB discussions groups.
Contributing to the MariaDB Project is the page that gathers together everything you need to get started.
The community category contains a lot of interesting links about how to participate.
You can also consider sponsoring a feature.
Welcome to the MariaDB community!
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
For reporting documentation bugs specifically, see .
MariaDB's bug and feature tracker is found at .
This page contains general guidelines for the community for reporting bugs and feature requests in MariaDB products. If you want to discuss a problem or a new feature with other MariaDB developers, you can find the email lists and forums .
First, check that the bug or feature request isn't already filed in the .
For the MariaDB issue database, use JIRA search to check if a report you are going to submit already exists. You are not expected to be a JIRA search guru, but please at least make some effort.
MariaDB is a , drop-in replacement of the MySQL® Database Server. It includes all major open source storage engines.
You can see a as well as a .
The source code for MariaDB is on . Binaries and packages are .
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
To provide a developed, stable, and DBMS that is, on the user level, broadly compatible with MySQL.
We strive for interoperability with both our own, and our upstream, communities.
Until , MariaDB was kept up to date with the latest MySQL release from the same branch. For example was up to date with MySQL 5.1.47, and so on.
We did a merge from the main MySQL branch for every new MySQL release or when there was some critical bugfix applied to the main branch.
Since , MariaDB includes backported features from MySQL as well as entirely new features not found anywhere else, but does not necessarily include all MySQL features.
We strive to keep our main trees as free from bugs as possible. It should be reasonably safe to pull from our trees at any time.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
The code is hosted on . You can branch the latest code from there, and you can also push your own changes as a new branch that can be shared with others.
is done with standard Unix tools: CMake (or autotools for MariaDB versions below 5.5), Gnu Make, GCC (or other C/C++ compiler on some systems). On , CMake and Visual Studio are used.
The current state of the source with respect to build/test failures can be seen in .
For project management and bug tracking, we use .
The page has links to instructions on setting up a full development environment, if you are interested.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
According to MySQL docs:
The maximum number of tables that can be referenced in a single join is 61. This also applies to the number of tables that can be referenced in the definition of a view.
Does the same maximum (61) applies to MariaDB, too?
If yes, are there plans for raising this limit?
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
Q: What is MariaDB Community Server and its main purpose? A: MariaDB Community Server is a popular free and open-source relational database management system (RDBMS), originally forked from MySQL. It is actively developed and maintained by MariaDB plc and a global community of contributors. It's known for its strong performance, stability, and a rich feature set suitable for a wide range of applications.
Q: Can MariaDB Community Server be used as a direct MySQL replacement? A: Yes, in many scenarios and for numerous versions, MariaDB Community Server is designed to be a compatible, drop-in replacement for MySQL, facilitating easy migration for users. However, as both MariaDB and MySQL evolve independently, some differences may exist in newer or more advanced features.
Q: What are the key benefits and features of MariaDB Community Server? A: Key benefits of MariaDB Community Server include its true open-source nature (GPLv2 license), a broader selection of advanced storage engines (like Aria, MyRocks, and Spider, in addition to the standard InnoDB), continuous feature enhancements, performance improvements, and the support of a vibrant, active global community.
Here you can ask questions if MariaDB supports a certain feature that doesn't fit into any specific category.
Before asking a questions about a non existing feature, please first check the if there is already plans for that feature.
The page has the current stable and development releases.
See the page for plans for future versions of MariaDB.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
is part of the Amazon Web Services, that allows one to setup and run a relational database in the cloud. It supports running MariaDB in addition to MySQL, PostgreSQL, and other common relational databases.
Gee-Hwan Chuang of Listia has written a guide titled . He recommends using .
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
Frequently Asked Questions for MariaDB that also apply to MySQL
Here you can find answer to questions about licensing MariaDB/MySQL/plugins etc
Choose Issues => Search for issues;
If the form opens for you with a long blank line at top, press Basic on the right to switch to a simpler mode;
In the Project field, choose the related project, (MDEV for generic MariaDB server and clients);
In the Contains text text field, enter the most significant key words from your future report;
Press Enter or the magnifying glass icon to search.
If you see issue reports which are already closed, pay attention to the 'Fix version/s' field -- it is possible that they were addressed in the upcoming release. If they are said to be addressed in the release that you are currently using or earlier, you can ignore them and file a new one (although please mention in your report that you found them, it might be useful).
If you find an open issue report, please vote/add a comment that the issue also interests you along with any additional information you have that may help us to find and address the issue.
If the issue is not in the MariaDB issue database yet, then it's time to file a report. If you're filing a report about an issue that's already in the MySQL issue database, please indicate so at the start of the report. Filing issue reports from MySQL in the MariaDB issue database makes sense, because:
It shows the MariaDB team that there is interest in having this issue addressed in MariaDB.
It allows work to start on addressing the issue in MariaDB - assigning versions, assigning MariaDB developers to the issue, etc.
Bugs and feature requests are reported to the MariaDB issue tracker.
Please note that our JIRA entries are public, and JIRA is very good at keeping a record of everything that has been done. What this means is that if you ever include confidential information in the description there will be a log containing it, even after you've deleted it. The only way to get rid of it will be removing the JIRA entry completely.
Attachments in JIRA are also public.
Access to a comment can be restricted to a certain group (e.g. Developers only), but the existing groups are rather wide, so you should not rely on it either.
If you have private information -- SQL fragments, logs, database dumps, etc. -- that you are willing to share with MariaDB team, but not with the entire world, put it into a file, compress if necessary, upload to the mariadb-ftp-server, and just mention it in the JIRA description. This way only the MariaDB team will have access to it.
As explained above, all JIRA issues are public. If you believe you have found a security vulnerability, send an email to security@mariadb.org for, please, do not use JIRA for that. We will enter it in JIRA ourselves, following the responsible disclosure practices.
Below is the information we need to be able to fix bugs. The more information we get and the easier we can repeat the bug, the faster it will be fixed.
A good bug report consists of:
The environment (Operating system, hardware and MariaDB version) where the bug happened.
Any related errors or warnings from the server error log file. Normally it is hostname.err file in your database directory, but it can be different depending on the distribution and version; if you cannot find it, run SELECT @@log_error on the running server. If either the variable or the file it points at is empty, the error log most likely goes to your system log. If this is systemd you can get the last 50 lines of the MariaDB log with journalctl -n 50 -u mariadb.service. If possible, attach the full unabridged error log at least from the last server restart and till the end of the log.,
If the problem is related to MariaDB updates, or otherwise changing the version of the server, recovery from a previous crash, and such, then include the previous versions used, and the error log from previous server sessions.
The content of your my.cnf file or alternatively the output from mariadbd --print-defaults or SHOW VARIABLES.
Any background information you can provide (, tables, table definitions (show-create-table SHOW CREATE TABLE {tablename}), data dumps, query logs).
If the bug is about server producing wrong query results: the actual result (what you are getting), the expected result (what you think should be produced instead), and, unless it is obvious, the reason why you think the current result is wrong.
If the bug about a performance problem, e.g. a certain query is slower on one version than on another, output of EXPLAIN EXTENDED <query> on both servers. If its a SELECT query use .
A test case or some other way to repeat the bug. This should preferably be in plain SQL or in mysqltest format. See mysqltest/README for information about this.
If it's impossible to do a test case, then providing us with a would be of great help.
The section below describes which JIRA fields need to be populated while filing reports, and what should be put there. Apart from what's mentioned below, you don't have to fill or change any fields while creating a new bug report.
If you are filing a report for MariaDB server, client programs, or MariaDB Galera cluster, the target project is MDEV. Connectors and MaxScale have separate projects with corresponding names. If you choose a wrong project, bug processing can be delayed, but there is no reason to panic -- we'll correct it. If you inform us about the mistake, we'll change it faster.
Some project names include:
CONC - MariaDB Connector/C
CONCPP - MariaDB Connector/C++
CONJ - MariaDB Connector/J
CONJS - MariaDB Connector/node.js
CONPY - MariaDB Connector/Python
MCOL - ColumnStore
MDBF - MariaDB Foundation Development (anything related to the )
MDEV - MariaDB server, client programs, or MariaDB Galera Cluster
MXS - MaxScale
ODBC - MariaDB Connector/ODBC
R2DBC - MariaDB Connector/R2DBC
Feature requests are not the same as bug reports. Specify a New feature type for feature requests in Jira, and a Bug type for bug reports. Like with the project field, choosing a wrong type will put the request to the wrong queue and can delay its processing, but eventually it will be noticed and amended.
See also plans for next release for things that we are considering to have in the next MariaDB release.
Please make sure the summary line is informative and distinctive. It should always be easy to recognize your report among other similar ones, otherwise a reasonable question arises -- why are they not duplicates?
Examples:
good summary: Server crash with insert statement containing DEFAULT into view
not a good summary: mariadbd crash
Generally, we try not to change the original summary without a good reason to do it, so that you can always recognize your own reports easily.
We do not have separate Severity/Priority fields in JIRA, so this Priority field serves a double purpose. For original reports, it indicates the importance of the problem from the reporter's point of view. The default is 'Major'; there are two lower and two higher values. Please set the value accurately. While we do take it into account during initial processing, increasing the value above reasonable won't do any good, the only effect will be the waste of time while somebody will be trying to understand why a trivial problem got such a high priority. After that, the value will be changed, and the report will be processed in its due time anyway.
Put everything you know about which versions are affected. There are both major versions (10.6, 10.5 etc.) and minor versions (10.5.9, 10.4.12, etc.) available for choosing. Please always specify there the exact version(s) (X.Y.Z) which you are working with, and where you experience the problem.
Additionally, If you know the exact version where the problem appeared, please put it as well. If the problem has been present, as far as you know, in all previous releases, you can also put there the major version, e.g. 10.0. Alternatively, you can mention all of it in the description or comments.
Please also note in the description or comments which versions you know as not affected. This information will help to shorten further processing.
Put here environment-related information that might be important for reproducing or analyzing the problem: operating system, hardware, related 3rd-party applications, compilers, etc.
The most important part of the description are steps to reproduce the problem. See more details about bug report contents above in the section Contents of a good bug report.
If in the process of reproducing, you executed some SQL, don't describe it in words such as "I created a table with text columns and date columns and populated it with some rows" -- instead, whenever possible, put the exact SQL queries that you ran. The same goes for problems that you encountered: instead of saying "it did not work, the query failed, I got an error", always paste the exact output that you received.
Use {noformat}...{noformat} and {code}...{code} blocks for code and console output in the description.
If you have SQL code, a database dump, a log etc. of a reasonable size, attach them to the report (archive them first if necessary). If they are too big, you can upload them to ftp.askmonty.org/private. It is always a good idea to attach your cnf file(s), unless it is absolutely clear from the nature of the report that configuration is irrelevant.
If you found or filed a bug report either in MariaDB or MySQL or Percona bug base which you think is related to yours, you can put them in the Links section; same for any external links to 3rd-party resources which you find important to mention. Alternatively, you can just mention them in the description or comments.
You don't have to set any tags, but if you want to use any for your convenience, feel free to do so. However, please don't put too generic values -- for example, the tag mariadb is meaningless, because everything there is mariadb. Don't be surprised if some tags are removed later during report processing.
Our normal practice is to report a bug upstream if it's applicable to their version. While we can do it on your behalf, it is always better if you do it yourself -- it will be easier for you to track it further.
If the bug affects MySQL, it should also be reported at MySQL bugs database. If the bug affects Percona server and not MySQL, it should go to Percona Launchpad.
See the article How to produce a stack trace from a core file.
See the article here.
If you require personalized assistance, want to ensure that the bug is fixed with high priority, or want someone to login to your server to find out what's wrong, you can always purchase a Support contract from MariaDB plc or use their consulting services.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
Q: What license is MariaDB Community Server distributed under? A: MariaDB Community Server is licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 (GPLv2), ensuring it remains free and open source.
Q: Where can I download MariaDB Community Server? A: You can download official MariaDB Community Server packages from the MariaDB Foundation website (mariadb.org). Additionally, it is readily available in the software repositories of most major Linux distributions for easy installation.
The original copyright holder and the MariaDB Foundation both get (shared) copyright for the code.
Both parties can use their copy independently of each other for any purpose (as if each copy was completely separate and unique).
If you don't like the for code that you want to contribute to , the other option is to submit your code under the license.
The main difference is that MCA is a copyright assignment agreement; you assign the copyright to the MariaDB Foundation (but you retain it too, on your copy of the contribution), while BSD-new is a license; you allow the MariaDB Foundation to use your contribution under specific (albeit rather broad) terms.
With MCA, the MariaDB Foundation becomes a copyright holder, and it can defend the GPL and pursue violators, protecting its and your rights. This is the same reason why the Free Software Foundation too.
On the other hand, BSD-new is a well known FSF-approved Open Source license.
If you contribute on behalf of your employer, your employer's legal department is most probably already familiar with the BSD-new license. It might be much easier and faster to get them to approve your contribution if you contribute under this license.
If you are an individual contributor (or if your employer is fine with MCA), it makes sense to contribute under MCA, as it will allow the MariaDB Foundation to defend its Open Source way when needed.
For most other practical purposes there is no difference between these two ways of contributing. You keep the copyright to your contribution. And the MariaDB Foundation will be able to use your contribution in MariaDB Server, relicense it (for example, as GPLv2 or GPLv3) or use separately as a patch.
The MariaDB Foundation agrees that when it dual licenses code, it will not restrict the way the third party licensee uses the licensed copy of the code nor restrict how they use their own code.
The is based on . We think it is one of the best contributor agreements around!
Sun's SCA was unclear in a couple of points which we have fixed in the :
The patent grant has been made clear that it only affects the donated code, not any other code.
We added a clarification how code is donated; "Each submission must explicitly be marked that it's donated under the MCA"
We have made a promise in this FAQ how the MariaDB Foundation will Dual-license code. See Monty's blog post "" for a discussion about this.
With the establishment of the MariaDB Foundation, Monty Program Ab transferred all existing signed contributor agreements to the Foundation.
Question not answered? Subscribe to the and ask there or visit us on our or the #maria channel on.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
Question: When I use the mysql client as in mysql -u root -p -h <host>, does the password-enter prompt popup before or after the client has established a connection with the server?
Answer: Before the client has established a connection to the server.
How do we derive the answer?
lovegood:~ byte$ mysql -uroot -p -hlocalhost
Enter password:
Welcome to the MariaDB monitor. Commands end with ; or \g.
Your MariaDB connection id is 1
Server version: 5.2.8-MariaDB Source distribution
This software comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software,
and you are welcome to modify and redistribute it under the GPL v2 license
Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the current input statement.
MariaDB [(none)]> \q
Bye
lovegood:~ byte$ mysql.server stop
Shutting down MySQL
. SUCCESS!
lovegood:~ byte$ mysql -uroot -p -hlocalhost
Enter password:
ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/tmp/mysql.sock' (2)This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
Instructions on how to build a mysqld that contains all the information we need to fix problems you encounter. (A more detailed explanation can be found here.)
Add the option to your /.my.cnf or /etc/my.cnf file under the [mysqld] tag.
Get the latest MariaDB code from GitHub.
Compile MariaDB with the -g compiler flag (Unix).
Optionally: with more checking - will cause slowdown.
Shut down your old mysqld server.
Install the new compiled mysqld binary. Note that if you are compiling same version of MariaDB that you have already installed it's enough to just copy this one binary!
Restart mysqld.
Compiling with -g should not cause any notable slowdown of the server.
You can of course also do make install, but the above way allows you to go back to your old binary if needed.
If you get any errors about a wrong number of error messages, you can fix that by copying the corresponding language file from sql/share over your old ones (this should be reasonably safe to do).
Now when you get a crash do the following:
Create a README file that describes the problem. You can use the mysqlbug script to generate a template for this.
Create a tar file containing the core, the mysqld binary and README. If possible, also add any database files that could help us repeat the problem!
Send it to our secure ftp server:
To be able to follow the progress, create a bug report in about this. This should be easy to do based on the information you have in your README file.
.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
Q: What is mariadb-backup and its primary use? A: mariadb-backup is a command-line utility included with MariaDB Community Server. Its primary use is to perform physical "hot" backups of MariaDB database instances, especially those utilizing transactional storage engines like InnoDB and XtraDB. This tool is based on the well-regarded Percona XtraBackup technology.
Q: What are the main advantages of using mariadb-backup for database backups? A: The main advantages of mariadb-backup are its ability to perform online (hot) backups with minimal locking. This means your MariaDB database remains largely available for both read and write operations during the backup process. For large databases, mariadb-backup is generally much faster than logical backup methods (like mariadb-dump) and, when used in conjunction with MariaDB's binary logs, it enables precise point-in-time recovery (PITR).
Q: How does the mariadb-backup utility work to create backups? A: mariadb-backup works by copying the physical data files from the MariaDB data directory while the server is running. It continuously monitors for changes made to these files during the backup operation and records these modifications in a separate log file. In a subsequent "prepare" phase, these logged changes are applied to the copied data files to ensure they are brought to a transactionally consistent state, ready for restoration.
Q: Is mariadb-backup a suitable backup solution for all MariaDB storage engines? A: mariadb-backup is primarily designed for, and works most effectively with, transactional storage engines such as InnoDB and XtraDB, for which it can guarantee consistency and perform online backups. While it might be able to copy data files for other storage engines like Aria or MyISAM, it cannot ensure the same level of transactional consistency or perform true online backups for them. For non-transactional engines, mariadb-dump or filesystem-level snapshots might be more appropriate choices.
Q: Is the mariadb-backup tool free to use? A: Yes, mariadb-backup is an open-source tool that is included as a standard utility with MariaDB Community Server and is completely free to use.
When upgrading from MySQL 5.1 to you may encounter a process limit problem with your MariaDB installation. This is not MariaDB at fault. The issue is likely triggered with high connection counts to the database and possibly exacerbated by not using Thread pooling.
You might encounter the following error message if you are not out of available memory:
##SQLSTATE[HY000] [1135] Can't create a new thread (errno 11);##You can consult the manual for a possible OS-dependent bug when trying to connect. There is a very good explanation and troubleshooting with a work around on the Percona MySQL Performance Blog
Review your connections and thread consumption usage prior to doing an upgrade to avoid this being a problem.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
Instructions to narrow down problems on a replication replica.
Sometimes a event causes an error of some sort. A whole binary log file is sometimes impractical due to size or sensitivity reasons.
Step 1: Copy the binary log locally
This is just in case you don't quite extract the right information first. If the binlog expired off and you haven't got the right information, your bug report may not easily be reproducible.
Step 2: Create an extract header
Binary logs have a header portion. Without the header won't be able to read it. The header also contains valuable session information
We look at the binary log to see how big the header and session information is:
We see that the session information ends at 328 because of the last line, so we extract to that point.
We need to find out at what offset the entry at 129619 ends and it might be useful to extract some previous entries as well.
This page describes how community bug reports are processed among our products and explains what you need to notice while tracking bugs.
MariaDB does not have any SLA or guaranteed reaction times on bugs in Jira. While we are taking bugs reported by the community very seriously, and aim to provide response and to handle issues as fast as possible, MariaDB does not have a dedicated bug verification team, this activity is performed on the best-effort basis.
To make sure your bug report will be confirmed and moved forward faster, please follow about creating bug reports.
Questions? See the page.
These terms apply to your contribution of materials to a product or project owned or managed by us ('project'), and set out the intellectual property rights you grant to us (The MariaDB Foundation) in the contributed material. If this contribution is on behalf of a company, the term 'you' will also mean the company you identify below. If you agree to be bound by these terms, fill in the information requested below and provide your signature. Read this agreement carefully before signing.
Query with ORDER BY in a FROM subquery produces unordered result. Is this a bug? Below is an example of this:
returns a result set that is not necessarily ordered by field2. This is not a bug.
A "table" (and subquery in the FROM clause too) is - according to the SQL standard - an unordered set of rows. Rows in a table (or in a subquery in the FROM clause) do not come in any specific order. That's why the optimizer can ignore the clause that you have specified. In fact, the SQL standard does not even allow the ORDER BY clause to appear in this subquery (we allow it, because ORDER BY ... LIMIT ... changes the result, the set of rows, not only their order).
You need to treat the subquery in the FROM clause, as a set of rows in some unspecified and undefined order, and put the ORDER BY on the top-level
If you can't find help in the , you can also subscribe to the or to communicate with MariaDB users and developers.
There's an active help community on for programming with SQL and indexing questions, and for non-programming questions for example tuning/backups/architecture/migration/replication etc. Use the mariadb tag so questions are searchable by those that can help you.
If you have a question about a feature that is not properly documented or something that is not working as expected, go to the corresponding and ask your question there.
You can report and check on bugs which apply to MariaDB in .
offers .
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
Now let's assume we want to start at our original 129619 and finish before 130168
Check the extract:
Upload this to the private uploads or attach to the public bug report if nothing sensitive there.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
sudo cp /var/lib/mysql/mysql-bin.000687 ~/
sudo chown $USER: ~/mysql-bin.000687mariadb-binlog --base64-output=decode-rows --verbose mysql-bin.000687 | more
/*!50530 SET @@SESSION.PSEUDO_SLAVE_MODE=1*/;
/*!40019 SET @@session.max_insert_delayed_threads=0*/;
/*!50003 SET @OLD_COMPLETION_TYPE=@@COMPLETION_TYPE,COMPLETION_TYPE=0*/;
DELIMITER /*!*/;
# at 4
#150323 22:45:58 server id 76 end_log_pos 245 Start: binlog v 4, server v 5.5.39-MariaDB-log created 150323 22:45:58
# at 245
#150323 22:45:58 server id 76 end_log_pos 328 Query thread_id=9709067 exec_time=0 error_code=0
SET TIMESTAMP=1427116558.923924/*!*/;
SET @@session.pseudo_thread_id=9709067/*!*/;
SET @@session.foreign_key_checks=1, @@session.sql_auto_is_null=0, @@session.unique_checks=1, @@session.autocommit=1/*!*/;
SET @@session.sql_mode=0/*!*/;
SET @@session.auto_increment_increment=1, @@session.auto_increment_offset=1/*!*/;
/*!\C utf8 *//*!*/;
SET @@session.character_set_client=33,@@session.collation_connection=33,@@session.collation_server=8/*!*/;
SET @@session.time_zone='SYSTEM'/*!*/;
SET @@session.lc_time_names=0/*!*/;
SET @@session.collation_database=DEFAULT/*!*/;
BEGIN
/*!*/;
# at 328As of today, initial bug processing routine in MariaDB is not strictly formalized. This section describes the de-facto status rather than any policy.
The process is different for bug reports (Bug type in JIRA) vs feature requests (Task type). The process described below is related to bug reports.
All new bug reports go to the waiting list, to be reproduced and confirmed by a member of the team. The bug stays in the queue until one or more of the conditions below are met:
Bug report is assigned to a developer;
Bug report gets status 'Confirmed';
Bug report gets the label 'upstream';
Bug report is closed (on whatever reason).
With other things equal, bug reports in the queue are initially handled in the FIFO manner; however, there are various factors that make things not equal.
First thing that is taken into account is Priority. It does not mean that everything needs to be filed as Critical; on the contrary, it means that Priority should be chosen wisely. Although a report with higher Priority will be looked at sooner, as soon as it becomes clear that the Priority is set to a higher value than the problem deserves, it will be amended and put back to the queue. However, if the high priority is justified, we will try to process the report as fast as possible.
Another important factor is the quality of the report itself.
If the report is written well and has all information, including a reproducible test case, it can be verified and moved forward quickly.
If the report is written clearly enough, but does not have enough information, it will get fast enough first response where we will request the missing details; but the further exchange can take a lot of time until we get everything we need to work on the issue.
Finally, reports which are written in a tangled and incomprehensible manner get the slowest response time, because even if eventually it turns out that they do have all required information, it is difficult and time-consuming to extract and process, so they can be put aside for some time.
Complete processing of a reported bug can be complicated and time-consuming, especially the reproducing part. We do not want our users to wait for long not knowing if their bug report has even been noticed, we try to provide first response quicker than that.
First response to the bug, which we are trying to provide as quickly as possible, is one of these:
If we can reproduce the problem based on the information that was provided in the initial description, the report gets the status Confirmed.
If it is obvious from the initial description that the bug report is a duplicate of an existing one, or the problem has already been fixed in later releases or in the upcoming release, or the described behavior is not a bug, or, in very rare cases, it is admitted to be a bug, but it is not going to be fixed, the report gets closed with the corresponding Resolution value and a comment with the explanation.
If the bug report at least appears to describe a real bug, but we do not have enough information to proceed, we will request the information from the reporter, and the report will go to the Need feedback list.
If on some reason it is clear from the bug report that it will be very difficult to reproduce based on the information from the user, but there is a reason to believe that the problem can be analyzed by code inspection, the bug report can be assigned to a developer who is an expert in the corresponding area for the analysis.
We realize that "as quickly as possible" is a relative term. The dream scenario is that all reports are responded to in a matter of hours; however, more realistically, it can take a few days, and in some cases, when the team is overly busy with a big upcoming release or some other extraordinary events, it can even be weeks.
When a report does not have all the information to reproduce the problem right away (which is quite often the case), we will ask the reporter to provide the missing information. Usually it takes more than one iteration to get everything right, so it is important that you respond to the questions as precisely as you can. Please make sure that you answered all questions (or, if you cannot answer some of them, please say so, otherwise we will have to ask again, and more time will be wasted on it).
There is no status "Need Feedback" in our JIRA; instead, we are using the label need_feedback. As long as the report has this label, it remains on the "Waiting for feedback" list. The label is set and removed manually by whoever asks for the feedback and receives it; so it can happen that the reporter has provided the response, but it remained unnoticed and the bug keeps waiting. It will be our fault, but human errors happen; it would help a lot if the reporter removed the label along with providing the feedback.
This question arises fairly often, so it deserves mentioning.
As already said before, the need_feedback label is set and removed manually. JIRA e-mail updates about it can be confusing when you look at them quickly. For example, when someone removes the label, the email looks like this:
What it says that the Labels field has become empty, while before it had been need_feedback. People often misread it and ask "What else do you need from me? I've answered your questions". This update means that at the moment we don't need anything, your report is back to the incoming queue, and your feedback will be analyzed as soon as possible. Then, we will possibly ask more questions and set the label again, and the notification will look like this:
If the feedback exchange was fruitful and we received enough information to proceed, the bug report will go through the normal verification steps.
Reports do not stay open on the "Need Feedback" list forever. After a month of waiting, if we do not get a response from the reporter, and still cannot proceed without it, we close the report as Incomplete with the corresponding comment. This state is not irreversible: you can still add comments and provide the information even when the report is closed as Incomplete, and it will be re-opened.
Sometimes it happens that after iterations of feedback requests we run out of ideas what else to ask from the reporter, and still could not verify the bug, or that the reporter is willing to collaborate with us, but cannot provide the necessary information on objective reasons (usually when the problem happens on a production instance). In some cases we might close the report as "Cannot reproduce", which we consider our loss; but more often we want to keep it open, in hope that more information arrives, maybe from a different source, and together with this report they will help us get to the bottom of the problem; if it happens so, the report gets assigned to somebody without being confirmed, just so it remains at least on somebody's radar, and it will stay open for a long time. It does not mean it is forgotten, it means that for the time being we hit the wall. You are very welcome to comment on such reports, whenever you think you might have something to add, because this is exactly what we are waiting for.
Normally the bug report has to go through the following steps before it is moved forward to fixing:
the described problem needs to be reproduced;
it needs to be checked against all active post-Beta versions of MariaDB where it is theoretically applicable (as of the moment of writing this article, it is 5.5, 10.0, 10.1);
in case it is a relatively recent regression, the guilty change needs to be found;
the component or functional area should be determined, so that the bug gets assigned to the right person.
After that the bug is ready for fixing.
Sometimes it seems hard to understand from the outside how MariaDB development team chooses which bugs to fix in a particular release, or why some bugs are fixed faster than others, or why critical bugs stay untouched for a long time.
MariaDB currently uses 1- or 2-week sprint model for server development and bugfixing. It needs a separate article to describe it in more detail, but for bugfixing, in a nutshell it means the following.
one or two weeks before a scheduled release the team creates a new sprint and evaluates existing bugs which affect this release;
the selected bugs are added to the new sprint;
during the active sprint, the developer is supposed to work on the tasks which are part of the sprint, unless a true emergency arises.
There are two important consequences of this model which sometimes cause a confusion:
If the current sprint is for one version, e.g. 10.0, and you file a bug for another version, e.g. 10.1, then, even if the bug is really critical, it won't be jumped on right away: it makes no sense, because the 10.1 is not going to be released next week anyway, while 10.0 will be. When the 10.0 sprint finishes, and 10.1 sprint starts, your bug will be picked up for that sprint and fixed then.
If the current sprint for 10.1 is already in progress, newly created 10.1 reports normally won't be included into it, unless they are considered so extremely important that the developer is allowed to ignore the sprint plan.
When a new sprint is created, bugs which affect the scheduled release are evaluated.
from all such bugs assigned to a developer, each developer chooses bugs he is able to work on during the given time interval;
bug priority plays the most significant role in this process, but this is not the only factor.
Blocker bugs must be either fixed or degraded before the release goes out;
Critical bugs should be chosen above other bugs, except for Blockers;
among Major bugs,
bugs with patches, either external, or upstream, or internal, are usually prioritized above ordinary bug reports;
external reports (community reports) are ranked higher than bugs reported by the development team;
bugs which can realistically be fixed in the given time interval are chosen more frequently than those that are likelly to take several cycles;
Minor bugs are usually fixed when there are no more urgent tasks.
If a bug report has passed through verification stage, either being confirmed, or pushed forward to the development-level analysis as is, there can be various updates on it. It is important to understand what they mean.
All JIRA fields are public, but some of them are mainly used for internal development process, while others are more user-facing. This article describes which fields should be populated during the initial report submission. There is a different set of fields important for tracking purposes.
It might come as counter-intuitive, but in the existing JIRA structure, the Status field does not mean much for the user, it is mainly used for development and management purposes. On the contrary, the Resoluton field is entirely user-facing: it does not participate in planning or development. It remains the same 'Unresolved' for the whole life of the report, and is only changed when the bug gets closed, demonstrating the reason why it was closed.
Resolution
Unresolved - the bug report remains open, the work has not been finished.
Fixed - the bug has been fixed, see Fix version/s and possibly comments to the report for more information. This is almost always a terminal state, we do not re-open fixed bugs even if they later re-appear; please create a new one instead. The only case when it can be re-opened is when the 'Fix version/s' have not been released yet.
Duplicate - the bug report is identical to an already existing open (or recently fixed) report, which will be quoted in the comments and/or links. It is usually a terminal state, unless it is proven later that the report was not a duplicate after all.
Not a bug - the described behavior is not a bug, there will be a comment explaining why. It is usually a terminal state, unless you object and show why it is a bug. If the report is in fact a feature request, then rather than closing it as 'Not a bug', we will switch the type to 'Task'.
Incomplete - we had requested feedback from the user and waited for 1 month, but did not receive it. It is a pseudo-terminal state, the report can be re-opened any time when the requested information is provided.
Cannot reproduce - rather rarely used "resolution", which means we could not find the way to confirm the problem described by the reporter, and ran out of ideas what other information to request from the reporter in order to reproduce it.
Won't fix - another rarely used "resolution", which means that the bug is admitted, but we have no intention to fix it. Usually it happens when the bug only affects old versions, and is not important enough to fix in the old versions; or, when it is related to systems or architectures we don't officially support.
Status
Open, Confirmed - this distinction is used in our internal queues, but from the user's perspective the difference is slim: setting the bug report to 'Confirmed' does mean that we are satisfied with the information provided in the report, but the user will also know about it from our comments and other updates. Otherwise, bugs in both statuses can be considered for fixing.
In Progress, Stalled - different intermediate states of bugs which help developers to filter their lists and management to gather a picture of the current activity. For the user, there is no important difference -- despite the negative semantics, 'Stalled' does not mean that something is wrong with the bug report, only that the developer is not working on it actively at the moment.
In review - means, literally, that a peer review has been requested.
Closed - means that the bug report is closed, on whatever reason. The real reason is in the 'Resolution' field.
This is an important field for progress tracking.
After the bug is confirmed or otherwise acknowledged, this field is populated with a set of major versions where we intend to fix it. E.g. if the field is set to 10.0 10.1, it means that at the moment we consider it for fixing in some future 10.0 release (not necessarily the next one), and the bugfix will be merged into the next 10.1 release after that; but we do not consider it for fixing in 5.5, even if it is affected to.
To some extent, you can influence the initial plans: if you see that the fix is not targeted for versions where you think it should be, you can comment on the report, and if you provide convincing arguments and make your case, it can be reconsidered.
The value of the field is not a promise to fix the bug in the mentioned releases. It can be changed both ways: during further analysis, the developer can find out that it can be safely fixed in an earlier release, or, on the contrary, that it cannot be safely fixed in the GA release, and the fix can only go to the next versions which are currently under development.
After the bug is fixed, the value of the field is changed to the exact versions, e.g. 10.0.25 10.1.14. It means that the patch has been pushed into the 10.0 branch, and will be released with 10.0.25 release; it also means that the patch will be merged to 10.1 tree and released with 10.1.14 release, but it does not mean that it is already in the 10.1 branch.
As the other article says, the Priority field serves two purposes. During the initial bug creation, it indicates the importance of the bug report from the user's perspective (in other bug tracking systems it is called 'Severity' or alike). After the bug has been confirmed, the same field is used for development purposes, to prioritize bug fixing (real 'Priority'). While we take into account the reporter's view on the matter, we can change the initial priority both ways, depending on the information we revealed during the problem analysis, versions affected, etc.
The value of the field normally means the following:
Blocker - we currently think that the bug must be fixed before the next release(s) set in the 'Fix version/s' field;
Critical - the bug should be picked up for fixing earlier than any other bugs apart from blockers;
Major - the bug will be present in the main queue for fixing in the upcoming 'Fix version/s', although only a part of such bugs will be fixed in every release;
Minor, Trivial - the bugs will be picked up when the assignee does not have more pressing issues for the upcoming release.
Please note that the Priority field only demonstrates our intentions at the moment, it does not guarantee that things will happen according to these intentions.
Labels are mostly used for more convenient filtering and don't carry much importance otherwise. However, there are a few that affect the processing of a bug report:
need_feedback - its role during the initial bug processing was already described above. However, after a bug is confirmed and queued for fixing, it should not appear anymore; and even if it's left by mistake, it won't affect the progress.
upstream - the label means that the bug also exists in the upstream version of the corresponding component - normally, in MySQL server or a client program, but can also be in Percona's XtraDB or TokuDB. Normally there should also be a link to the upstream bug report. Setting this label means that we might want to take for a while and see whether the bug is fixed in the upstream version before we fix it in MariaDB directly. It was usual for 5.5, less usual for 10.x where bugfixes, apart from InnoDB, are not merged automatically. The label is still set, but it is more for informational purposes than to affect the priority.
upstream-fixed - the label means that the bug used to exist in the upstream version, but not anymore. It means that there is nothing more to wait; moreover, it might be worth picking up the bug soon and at least evaluating the upstream bugfix.
MariaDB encourages contributors to provide bug fixes; so, bug reports which come with the fixes in general have a quicker turnaround. The bug fix can come in a form of Git pull request, or, in simple cases, as a diff pasted in or attached to the bug report itself.
There are some basic rules for bugs, particularly for setting the Resolution value, which we want to stick to and which might be different from procedures you came across in other projects. It mainly concerns external bugs (those that come from the community), for internal ones we can cut corners more freely.
This all is easier to understand if one remembers that the Resolution or its analogues in other bug-tracking systems is a user-facing field, as already mentioned above, and that it relates more to the report, than to the bug itself.
An older bug report cannot be a duplicate of a newer one, it is nonsensical. The only possible exception is when an older bug has no useful information whatsoever and the reporter does not provide any helpful feedback, while a newer report was not closed as a duplicate right away and got some useful updates. The common example of such exception is when the first report is just an optimized stack trace, no query, no data, nothing to work with, while the second report has a test case. But if the first reporter at least makes an effort to collaborate, the report deserves to be treated with respect.
Bug reports which have essentially different descriptions and/or test cases should not be duplicates. The common example is this: a developer creates a bug saying something like "this and that pieces of code are wrong, it should be so and so"; and then a user files a bug saying "this SQL produces a wrong result on this data set". Even if they are about the same error in the code at the end, they are not duplicate bug reports.
Obviously, a report can never be a duplicate of anything private (luckily it does not concern MariaDB server so far, as the bug reports are public).
In general, a bug report is a duplicate of another one if, and only if, the new reporter could find the existing report just by a reasonable JIRA search.
A bug report should not be closed as "cannot reproduce" if it was once verified/confirmed, but disappeared in later versions. It's unfair to the reporter, and also dangerous to the product. We should know why a bug stopped being reproducible -- either we find when and how it was fixed (and close the report as "Fixed in version X by a patch for Y"), or we discover that it wasn't in fact fixed, but just masked. The simplest example is a change of execution plan in optimizer: server would crash on a particular query, then due to a change in optimizer it started using a different plan for the same query, so it wouldn't go through the crashing path anymore. The crash is still there, though.
In general, the "cannot reproduce" resolution is a last resort. Usually if we can't reproduce something, it means that either the reporter did not provide required information (and then the resolution should be "Incomplete"), or we don't know what to request from the reporter, and then we should keep thinking, rather than close it. Of course, it happens that the bug is genuinely not reproducible, but it shouldn't be decided lightly.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
With respect to any worldwide copyrights, or copyright applications and registrations, in your contribution:
you hereby assign to us joint ownership, and to the extent that such assignment is or becomes invalid, ineffective or unenforceable, you hereby grant to us a perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, worldwide, no-charge, royalty-free, unrestricted license to exercise all rights under those copyrights. This includes, at our option, the right to sub-license these same rights to third parties through multiple levels of sub-licensees or other licensing arrangements; you agree that each of us can do all things in relation to your contribution as if each of us were the sole owners, and if one of us makes a derivative work of your contribution, the one who makes the derivative work (or has it made) will be the sole owner of that derivative work;
you agree that you will not assert any moral rights in your contribution against us, our licensees or transferees;
you agree that we may register a copyright in your contribution and exercise all ownership rights associated with it; and
you agree that neither of us has any duty to consult with, obtain the consent of, pay or render an accounting to the other for any use or distribution of your contribution.
With respect to any patents you grant licenses to without payment to any third party, which would restrict us from using the contributed code as if we would own a shared copyright to it, you hereby grant to us a perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, worldwide, no-charge, royalty-free license to: make, have made, use, sell, offer to sell, import, and otherwise transfer your contribution in whole or in part, alone or in combination with or included in any product, work or materials arising out of the project to which your contribution was submitted, and
at our option, to sub-license these same rights to third parties through multiple levels of sub-licensees or other licensing arrangements.
Note that you don't give us rights to the patent in any other way than to give us the right to freely use the contributed code in the above ways.
Except as set out above, you keep all right, title, and interest in your contribution. The rights that you grant to us under these terms are effective on the date you first submitted a contribution to us, even if your submission took place before the date you sign these terms. Any contribution we make available under any license will also be made available under a suitable FSF (Free Software Foundation) or OSI (Open Source Initiative) approved license.
With respect to your contribution, you represent that:
it is an original work and that you can legally grant the rights set out in these terms;
it does not to the best of your knowledge violate any third party's copyrights, trademarks, patents, or other intellectual property rights; and
you are authorized to sign this contract on behalf of your company (if identified below).
These terms will be governed by the laws of the Finland. Any choice of law rules will not apply.
To deliver these terms to us, scan and email to
MariaDB Contributor Agreement – version 1.0
Questions? See the MCA FAQ page.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
SELECTThis page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
Questions asked by the public about MariaDB and related software. Note that bugs, problems and features requests should be submitted to the MariaDB bug database so that they can be process properly by the MariaDB developer and QA teams.
dd if=mysql-bin.000687 of=mysql-bin.000687-extract-offset-129619 bs=1 count=328mariadb-binlog --base64-output=decode-rows --verbose mysql-bin.000687 | grep '^# at ' | grep -C 10 '^# at 129619$'
# at 127602
# at 127690
# at 128201
# at 128290
# at 128378
# at 128829
# at 128918
# at 129006
# at 129459
# at 129548
# at 129619
# at 129647
# at 130070
# at 130097
# at 130168
# at 130196
# at 130738
# at 130942
# at 130969
# at 131040
# at 131244mariadb-binlog --base64-output=decode-rows --verbose --start-position 129006 --stop-position 130168 mysql-bin.000687 | moredd if=mysql-bin.000687 bs=1 skip=129619 count=$(( 130168 - 129619 )) >> mysql-bin.000687-extract-offset-129619mariadb-binlog mysql-bin.000687-extract-offset-129619Elena Stepanova updated MDEV-9791:
----------------------------------
Labels: (was: need_feedback)Elena Stepanova updated MDEV-9801:
----------------------------------
Labels: need_feedback (was: )Your user name on GitHub:
Your contact information (Please print clearly):
Your name:
Your company's name (if applicable):
Mailing address:
Telephone:
Email:
Your signature:
Date:f o u n d a t i o n [at] m a r i a d b (dot) o r gSELECT field1, field2 FROM ( SELECT field1, field2 FROM table1 ORDER BY field2 ) ALIAScp sql/share/english/* mariadb-install-dir/share/mysql/englishsh> tar cvfz /tmp/mariadb-bug-'short-description'.tgz mariadb-data-dir/core* mariadb-install-dir/libexec/mysqld READMEsh> ftp -a ftp.askmonty.org
ftp> cd private
ftp> binary
ftp> put /tmp/mariadb-bug-'short-description'.tgz
ftp> quitbugs which affect the reporter in a worse matter get more attention than those that have viable workarounds;
Profiling the memory usage can be useful for finding out why a program appears to use more memory than it should. It is especially helpful for analyzing OOM situations or other cases where the memory grows linearly and causes problems.
To profile the memory usage of a program, there are multiple options. The following sections describe the methods that are available.
If a problem in memory usage is identified and it appears to be due to a bug, please open a new bug report on the MariaDB Jira under the correct project and include the relevant memory profiling output in it. Refer to How to Write a Good Bug Report for more details.
Transparent huge pages (THP), which is enabled by default in many newer Linux distributions, can cause out-of-memory-issues for MariaDB as THP is not suitable for databases. This is described at .
MariaDB Community Server 10.6.17, MariaDB Enterprise Server 10.6.16-11 and all other MariaDB server releases after these have THP disabled.
If and do not show an increase in memory, but the process still increases in size, then a likely problem is the system memory allocation library (malloc). Replacing malloc with should fix the issue in this case.
Recent MariaDB versions have a global variable that shows how much memory the MariaDB server has allocated. By monitoring this variable one can find out if if the MariaDB allocated memory grows.
One can also check memory usage per user with the :
This shows the current memory used per connection and the maximum memory they have used since the user connected.
The can also be used to find out who is allocated memory and for what.
Note that one can also set the variable to restrict a user's memory usage.
The toolkit comes with the memleak program that traces outstanding memory allocations. This is a very convenient way of debugging high memory usage as it'll immediately show where the memory is allocated at.
By default the tool will print output once every five seconds with the stacktraces that have the most open allocations. Ctrl+C can be used to interrupt the collection of the traces.
The profiling interval and the profiling duration can be passed as arguments to memleak. The first argument is how often a sample is taken and the second argument is how long to sample for. To help analyze excessive memory usage, collect the output of the memleak program for at least 60 seconds. The longer the profiling can be left on, the more accurate the information will be.
The overhead of the profiling can be large enough that it affects production workloads negatively. To reduce the overhead, the sampling frequency of memory allocations can be lowered using the --sample-rate option:
For example, -s 10 will sample only 10% of memory allocations which may miss out memory leaks from individual allocations but the longer the system is left running, the more likely it is that a leaking memory allocation is sampled. This means that even with a lower sampling rate, the source of the memory leak will eventually be found.
On RHEL based systems, the package is named bcc-tools. After installing it, use the following command to profile the memory usage 5 times per second over a window of 60 seconds:
On Ubuntu/Debian the package is named bpfcc-tools. After installing it, use the following command to profile the memory usage 5 times per second over a window of 60 seconds:
Jemalloc is an alternative to the default glibc memory allocator. It is capable of analyzing the heap memory usage of a process which allows it to be used to detect all sorts of memory usage problems with a lower overhead compared to tools like Valgrind. Unlike the ASAN and LSAN sanitizers, it is capable of detecting cases where memory doesn't actually leak but keeps growing with no upper limit (e.g. items get appended to a list but are never removed).
To enable jemalloc, the packages for it must be first installed from the system repositories. Ubuntu 20.04 requires the following packages to be installed for jemalloc profiling:
The version of jemalloc that is available in most Red Hat repositories is not compiled with memory profiling support enabled. For RHEL based distributions, the only option is to .
Once installed, edit the systemd service file with systemctl edit mariadb.service and add the following lines into it. The path to the libjemalloc.so file is OS-specific so make sure it points to the correct file. The example here is for Ubuntu and Debian environments.
Then create the directory for the profile files:
And finally restart MariaDB with systemctl restart mariadb.service.
The directory in /var/lib/mysql/jeprof/ will start to be filled by versioned files with a .heap suffix. Every time the virtual memory usage reaches a new high, a file will be created. Initially, the files will be created very often but eventually the pace will slow down. Once the problematic memory usage has been identified, the latest .heap file can be analyzed with the jeprof program.
The simplest method is to generate a text report with the following command.
A better way to look at the generated heap profile is with the PDF output. However, this requires the installation of extra packages (apt -y install graphviz ghostscript gv). To generate the PDF report of the latest heap dump, run the following command:
The generated heap-report.pdf will contain a breakdown of the memory usage.
Note that the report generation with the jeprof program must be done on the same system where the profiling was done. If done elsewhere, the binaries do not necessarily match and can cause the report generation to fail.
Similarly to the jemalloc memory allocator, the memory allocator comes with a leak checker and heap profiler.
On RHEL based systems, the gperftools package is in the EPEL repositories. These must be first enabled by installing the epel-release package.
After this, the gperftools package can be installed.
Once tcmalloc is installed, edit the systemd service file with systemctl edit mariadb.service and add the following lines into it.
Note: Make sure to use the correct path and library name to the tcmalloc library in LD_PRELOAD. The following example uses the Debian location of the library. The file is usually located in /usr/lib64/libtcmalloc_and_profiler.so.4 on RHEL systems. The version number of the library can also change which might require other adjustments to the library path.
Then create the directory for the profile files:
And finally restart MariaDB with systemctl restart mariadb.service.
The heap profiling is configured using environment variables. The details can be found in the Modifying Runtime Behavior section of the gperftools documentation:
By default, tcmalloc dumps the heap profile every time 1GiB of memory has been allocated (HEAP_PROFILE_ALLOCATION_INTERVAL) or whenever the high-water memory usage mark increases by 100MiB (HEAP_PROFILE_INUSE_INTERVAL). If there's no activity, no memory dumps will be generated.
To trigger a memory dump based on a time interval, set the HEAP_PROFILE_TIME_INTERVAL environment variable to the number of seconds between each dump. For example, with Environment=HEAP_PROFILE_TIME_INTERVAL=3600 there will be one heap dump per hour.
Depending on which OS you are using, the report generation program is named either pprof (RHEL) or google-pprof (Debian/Ubuntu).
It is important to pick the latest .heap file to analyze. The following command generates the heap-report.pdf from the latest heap dump. The file will show the breakdown of the memory usage.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
In this article we will explain how the MariaDB and MySQL server and client library licenses affect other applications and what steps you can take to comply with the GPL or avoid having to change your applications to GPL.
In the following text we talk about MariaDB. The guidelines also apply to MySQL in general, at least up to 5.1.55 which was the latest stable release at the time of writing.
MariaDB is distributed under the GPL license, version 2.
The MariaDB client libraries for , and are distributed under the LGPL license, version 2.1 or later. The LGPL license allows you to distribute these MariaDB client libraries freely with any application.
The MariaDB client library included with the MariaDB server is also GPL version 2, but has a that allows you to combine it with most other open source software, without conflicting with their license, even if that license is incompatible with the GPL. We do however recommend you to use the new for any non-GPL application.
The GPL license only affects code that you distribute to other parties.
Internal usage within an organization is totally free and not subject to any conditions. There is no such thing as 'internal distribution' that would restrict the usage of your code by requiring it to be GPLed.
Connecting to a remote service that runs MariaDB (or any other GPL software) in the background is also free.
For internal programs for which you own all the copyright(s), there is essentially no risk in using GPL software. The argument you can use in your defense is that if the software became GPL as part of the distribution, you as the copyright holder could immediately revert your part back to its original copyright. No one has the right to require you to reveal or redistribute your code to the outside of your organization even if you would have distributed it internally linked with GPL software!
If your lawyers are concerned about distributions of software linked with GPL libraries between different legal entities within your organization, you can solve this by distributing your components and the GPL software separately, and have your other entity combining them. You can also switch to use the new .
This section is for those that want to distribute the MariaDB client library code, but not the server, with their applications.
If your application is Free software/open source and uses one of the licenses listed in the , the GPL in the client library does not affect your application.
In other cases we recommend you to use the new .
If you are using a connector that is not GPL, you are only bound by the license of that connector. Some examples are:
.
The above have licenses that allow you to use them freely, without you being bound by the GPL.
If you are using a framework that allows you to connect dynamically to different RDBMS systems, any GPL licensed module loaded by the framework will not affect the application. Such frameworks are
ODBC (Open Database Connectivity)
JDBC (Java Database connectivity)
Perl
The reason the GPL in the MySQL client library would not affect your application in this case is that the GPL client is supporting a standard interface and is thus merely an optional component among many. Your application could just as easily use the framework to connect to a RDBMS other than MariaDB or MySQL.
Any software can be connected to the GPL v2 licensed MySQL Connector/ODBC, without the need for that software to be GPLed. This is because there is a piece of general management software, the ODBC manager, between the GPLed MySQL Connector/ODBC and your software. If any logic would require the software which interfaces with MySQL Connector/ODBC to be GPL, then that would apply also to the ODBC manager itself. Yet, the ODBC manager is not GPL, neither on Windows nor on Linux. By consequence, no one would be allowed to use MySQL ODBC driver for anything.
If your application is using a license that is not covered by the , you should use the new .
The LGPL license allows you to distribute these MariaDB client library freely with any application. If you modify the client library, you need to publish the new source code.
When you are distributing your application together with MariaDB or MySQL, you are bound by the GPL if some of the following statements apply:
You are using GPL code from MySQL linked directly to your application. (Like the MySQL GPL client library).
Your application requires the MariaDB server to work and without the MariaDB server it doesn't start or it has very limited functionality.
The problem with the client library can be avoided by using one of the solutions mentioned before on this page.
If your application works with many databases, either natively or by using one of the , then you can freely distribute the MariaDB server with your application without being affected by the GPL. The reason for this is that MariaDB would only be an optional, independent component in your software distribution and section 2 of the GPL explicitly allows this:
You also have the option to buy licenses for MySQL from Oracle to get MySQL under other copyright terms. If you would like to later be able to use MariaDB instead of MySQL, please ensure that your license agreement allows you to make changes to the MySQL code! (This is something that you should ensure in all cases as otherwise you may run into bugs that Oracle will not fix, you are not allowed to fix and could make MySQL software unusable for you!)
The rights to use the MariaDB code changes in your application can be requested.
The text above is written by Michael "Monty" Widenius, who is not a lawyer and you should not regard any statements of the above as 'ultimate truth' in all scenarios. On the other hand, it was David and Monty who together decided to make MySQL GPL and also decided and openly declared the intentions behind this license change, so there is some merit to information in this article.
If you want a second opinion of how GPL works in this case, you can contact or about this. Neither part has had anything to do with this KB article but they are the default authorities to turn to when you want to know more about the GPL or LGPL.
This page is licensed: CC BY-SA / Gnu FDL
SELECT id, MEMORY_USED, MAX_MEMORY_USED FROM information_schema.processlist;-s SAMPLE_RATE, --sample-rate SAMPLE_RATE
sample every N-th allocation to decrease the overheadsudo /usr/share/bcc/tools/memleak -p $(pidof mariadbd) 5 60 | tee memleak.logsudo memleak-bpfcc -p $(pidof mariadbd) 5 60 | tee memleak.logapt-get -y install libjemalloc2 libjemalloc-dev binutils[Service]
Environment=MALLOC_CONF=prof:true,prof_leak:true,prof_gdump:true,lg_prof_sample:18,prof_prefix:/var/lib/mysql/jeprof/jeprof
Environment=LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjemalloc.so.2mkdir /var/lib/mysql/jeprof/
chown mysql:mysql /var/lib/mysql/jeprof/jeprof --txt /usr/sbin/mariadbd $(ls -1 /var/lib/mysql/jeprof/*.heap|sort -V|tail -n 1) > heap-report.txtjeprof --pdf /usr/sbin/mariadbd $(ls -1 /var/lib/mysql/jeprof/*.heap|sort -V|tail -n 1) > heap-report.pdfsudo dnf -y install epel-releasesudo dnf -y install gperftoolssudo apt -y install google-perftools[Service]
Environment=LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtcmalloc_and_profiler.so.4
Environment=HEAPPROFILE=/var/lib/mysql/pprof/mariadbd.prof
Environment=HEAPCHECK=normal
Environment=HEAP_CHECK_AFTER_DESTRUCTORS=truemkdir /var/lib/mysql/pprof/
chown mysql:mysql /var/lib/mysql/pprof/pprof --pdf /usr/sbin/mariadbd $(ls /var/lib/mysql/pprof/*.heap|sort -V|tail -n 1) > heap-report.pdf"In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on
the Program with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on
a volume of a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other
work under the scope of this License."